(if only they realised the hours I can spend pouring over dictionaries of symbols or background research)... your work isn't worth as much as mine because its abstract. I'm always baffled, I'd never say such a thing about a landscape piece. I admire realism, wish I could stitch a tree that looks like a tree, but its just not me. During my P1 C&G studies we were often told "if you want a piece to look like a photo, take a photo" - not meaning that everyone had to go for abstract, but more its your interpretation, not an exact replica. So when I want the real, I take a photo, because I know I could never match or even get an essence of the reality. If you only knew how many photos I take of skies.....
For years and years I struggled, wanting to be a Constable, before finally realising that I'm more a Picasso. I can't help it, the abstract is just more natural for me - its not even that I see a tree and think pure shapes, there's no deep and meaningful thought in that regard, its just how I am, what flows out of my fingers. I don't understand any of the snobby attitude re any kind of art - to me, you either like something or you don't. Perhaps my thought processes are too simplistic, but surely we all need art in whatever form, whatever taste you have in music or drama, the point is to find pleasure and joy. Thank goodness for choice.
So my flower has to be some exotic species from a faraway land - because its never going to look like the real thing!!
Latest News: Burnham Art Trail - I will be stewarding in the Museum on the afternoon of Thursday 30th June. Come and say hello.